Preservation Case Law
Courts Maintain High Bar Before Imposing Sanctions for
Spoliation and Demand Better Discovery Practices
As we reflect on cases of 2016, we continue to see the courts analyzing them for spoliation with a high bar to determine if awarding sanctions is appropriate. The standards set forth in proposed changes to Rule 37(e) require that in order to impose an adverse inference, spoliation must have (i) caused substantial prejudice in the litigation and the result of willfulness or bad faith; or(ii) irreparably deprived a party of any meaningful opportunity to present or defend against the claims in the litigation.
Download to learn more about these most recent preservation cases:
Noble Roman’s, Inc. v. Hattenhauer Distrib. Co.
Living Color Enters. v. New Era Aquaculture, Ltd.
First Fin. Sec., Inc. v. Lee
Brown Jordan Int’l, Inc. v. Carmiclet
In re Takata Airbag Prods. Liab. Litig.
Best Payphones, Inc. v. The City of New York
Embrace modern cloud technologies and get a competitive advantage! Submit the form above to learn how.